Major Challenges in RPA implementation

Major Challenges in RPA implementation

RPA

Today’s digital world utilizes the most simple and powerful automation software by combing artificial intelligence, machine learning, and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) to create & automate any business process. Robotic Process Automation is ruling the world by providing the best automation solutions to almost all industries like healthcare, BPO, insurance, banking, and telecommunications. Especially for the healthcare industry, it offers huge benefits to optimize and achieve practice productivity. While implementing RPA Solutions with the new emerging technologies, there are few challenges to overcome that need to check while deploying these solutions. In this article, we discussed the top challenges of RPA implementation in the healthcare sector.

According to UiPath, 2014 was the moment when robotic process automation started to be a significant competitor to business process outsourcing. Afterward, it took only two more years until it started to be institutionalized by business companies. Where are we today? We are at a point where both adoption and scaling have advanced tremendously, and RPA has reached new levels of maturity, becoming a must for companies determined to pursue a real competitive advantage.

Here we listed the major challenges that come in the way of RPA implementation.

Starting with reasonable expectations: Given the RPA hype, it is easy to fall prey to an over-enthusiastic perspective. But keeping your feet on the ground is crucial because of the large-scale impact on the assessment of the outcomes of automation, and hence, on subsequent decisions regarding scaling up to enterprise level. A helpful way to do this is to start with a clear hierarchy of business objectives, and then figure out how exactly RPA can help to attain them.

RPA Achieves Short Term Results: RPA solutions offer seamless implementation benefits and better user experience. This can be achieved for short term issues and we can benefits from it. But when we think about achieving long term results, it requires complex omini-channel platforms and frequent workflow review and optimization.

Lack Of Capability: The RPA tools available today are very advanced and holds latest features, but we still don’t have limited machine learning capabilities with some tools. The real scope of automation will increase with AI and machine capability integration with RPA tools.

Managing employees’ resistance: The “robots will steal our jobs” narrative, often used as a typical robotic process automation objection, is the core reason for the staff’s lack of willingness to accept new technologies. Prior to engaging in the automation project, you should educate them regarding what software robots can and cannot do, and help them understand that the bots are to be seen as helping, and not as hindering, the current work roles. Moreover, you should invest in training employees regularly, as the ‘automation era’ will likely require them to acquire new skills.

Inability to automate end-to-end processes: For the more complex processes, RPA tools may be insufficient for directly automating all the process steps. “Divide and conquer” is our recommended way to go about this. Redesign these sophisticated tasks, break them into simpler parts, and start automation here. Additionally, try to leverage the joint work of RPA and other digital technologies like machine learning or optical character recognition. Keep in mind though the extra costs involved by this, so do not strive for end-to-end intelligent automation when cost-efficiency becomes questionable.

Insufficient assistance from the business department: Relying solely on the IT department is among the common RPA challenges that should be actively avoided throughout the automation project. According to RPA expert Nicole Schultz, “finance cannot depend on IT for RPA; it needs to be owned by the business side.” Business processes require a Process Design Document for the pilot phase, including workflow diagrams, data-specific business rules (for various types of data), a comprehensive list of technical exceptions that the operations unit may face during manual processing, etc. It is more likely that the pilot paves the way for successful long-term development if the business team gives feedback for bots’ performance.

Change Management: Business and IT teams need to collaborate and proactively provide system and business updates to RPA support team to update scripts, once they are in the production. It may create additional challenges if multiple applications are used in the process. Any change in the front end UI will impact the RPA script hence, the outcome.

Ownership: This means who owns RPA solutions. Is it lead by IT or Business teams? Business needs to provide the requirement, approve the solution design for feasibility, help in UAT and then measure the success rate. IT teams has a limited role primarily restricted to providing support in infrastructure requirements and test data creation. Business doesn’t necessarily have skills to provide the detailed level technical requirement at the time of BRD or define the test scenarios as needed by QA teams. The need for good business analysts is a paramount, however they are limited talent available in the market, who has exposure to RPA design and solution and understands potential value.

Lack of effectively structured RPA implementation teams: As always, lack of structure is a pitfall. But the good news is that it is not too difficult to be fixed. “Effective structure” arises out of clearly specified roles for the team members, sufficient knowledge about the processes selected for automation, as well as not allowing resources to be shared among multiple ongoing projects.

Technical and operational issues: Given that the ease of configuration is a core feature of RPA, it can be easy to forget asking for, and acting out the suggestions of the technical staff regarding technical and operational issues. The solution is easy though, and it amounts to following RPA maintenance protocols after the implementation phase.

Conclusion: Last year we wrote an article about the most common RPA pitfalls, with recommendations for ways to avoid them. We believe that the experience we gathered in the meantime from various projects has helped us to refine our approach to robotic process automation implementation challenges, making it easier for you to follow the way towards attaining your business goals. Functionality is a core feature of RPA; software robots can be seen as tools for cutting down costs and enhancing productivity. To these ends, however, you must be able, first, to acknowledge, and second, to overcome the challenges of RPA implementation. By going through the list above, we believe you will be one step closer to meeting your efficiency standards.

SHARE AT

0 Comments

Leave a Reply